Quote of the Week“If black folks want to be free, they must want to be educated. Without freedom of mind there can be no true and lasting freedom.”
— bell hooks
- Be on the look out for updates on the BSU this school year! We hope that this year will be productive and fun. #MyBSU 1 month ago
- Today is the last day to get BSU apparel for only $20. We accept cash or venmo @rockyduggles. 6 months ago
- We would like to thank our Black History Month keynote speaker Reverend Irene Monroe for an incredible talk... fb.me/6puEvJYkX 6 months ago
Tagsactivism afro-latino awkward biraciality Black cast Black History Month blacks black star cinema claim Clarence Thomas class community culture of poverty discourse domestic violence economy employment fashion freedom summer fun gender general discussion gentrification good times GOP graffiti harlem harlem renaissance hate crime Hip-Hop humor interracial relationships latin communities latino/a Martin Luther King Jr. Michelle Obamas Mississippi models Mountain Top movies music Muslim news Obama Obamas pariah poetry politics poverty poverty issue race racism racism in america racism today red tails religion solidarity speech statistics stereotypes stigma Supreme Court theatre Uncle Tom unity vogue voting WCRC wililams college williams college winter study women of color yale youtube
Tag Archives: GOP
The main campaign story of the week as I have been able to follow has centered around GOP candidate’s “victims” remarks. If you have not heard, allow me to catch you up on the story. A video has been circulating of Romney speaking at a fundraiser in Boca Raton, Florida on May 17 of this year. In this video, Romney is heard responding to a question posed to him from the audience, and he is heard responding, “There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. There are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe that government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you name it.” Throughout the week, Romney has attempted to defend and clarify these remarks which he claims were not “elegantly stated”.
In an attempt to defend his remarks, Romney offered up two remarks regarding his views on the economy. First, “I do believe that we should have enough jobs and enough take-home pay such that people have the privilege of higher incomes that allow them to be paying taxes,” said Romney this week. He would also proclaim that the right course for America is to “create growth, create wealth”. And lastly, Romney is also quoted as saying, “It’s a message which I am going to carry and continue to carry, which is that the president’s (Obama’s) approach is attractive to people who are not paying taxes because frankly my discussion about lowering taxes isn’t as attractive to them. Therefore I’m not likely to draw them into my campaign as effectively as those in the middle.” One Romney funder, and Republican National Committee member also defended Romney’s remarks by saying, “Romney believes in capitalism and the free market and wants to create 12 million jobs. Obviously, I think the president (Obama) is perfectly comfortable promoting government dependence.”
What does this mean on the campaign trail so far? Well, in three “swing” or “battleground” states, (Ohio, Virginia and Florida), current President Obama is holding slim leads. New polls have not quite reflected how badly or if these comments have damaged the image of GOP candidate Romney. But the question I pose to myself is, should it? First off, the idea that 47% of people do not pay federal income taxes does seem to me like a gross exaggeration. But for me, that is not the main issue that I feel we should address. What bothers me is that GOP candidate Romney states that his policies should appeal to the middle class. But if 47% of the American population, (as he states) is not even paying federal income tax, and is relying on the government, how big is this “middle” that Romney speaks of? 47% would put half the nation in his estimation darn near levels of poverty. I can agree that job growth is important, that all families should be working with a workable wage where paying taxes is feasible. However, labeling half the country as “dependent” is something I have an issue with. The idea that the government should work to create “wealth” is another idea I am not comfortable with. Again, this is personal. What is the public benefit of “wealth”? Wealth in my mind promotes people accumulating way past needs, at the expense of others. Should that be the goal of our national economic plan, individual wealth? Or should we instead be aiming for stabilization of our financial security while assuring a semblance of basic living standards for those who are struggling, often in spite of their own efforts?
But these are simply the questions that I have running on my mind. I do have my own opinions, and I do believe strongly in them. As always, I will always present information to you, as I received them. And I will always draw from a wide array from sources so as to avoid presenting information from any one source with any partisan biases that they present. I can never divorce my own ramblings and thoughts concerning the campaign from the posts, but my wish and desire is first to inform, and then offer my own sense of things. If there are any issues concerning policies that you wish to be included in any future posts, feel free to find me and I will do my best to put together the information you desire. You are always free to form you rown interpretations, and I am ok with that. Our obligation to each other as citizens, brothers and sisters and Americans is to make sure that we are all informed. And always make the attempt to listen to each other with an open mind and heart, acknowledging that there will not be a consensus opinion. Either way, I hope to see you all politically active, engaged and excited for Election Day. I do believe that this is an important election, and every vote counts.
Don Sidney Polite Junior
Primary season is in full effect for the presidential hopefuls. A significant portion of the news reports have focused on how this election will affect certain demographics, namely Black and Latin@ communities. Blacks and Latinos/as combined make up about 25% of this nation’s population. This is not to say that Blacks and Latinos/as share the same sentiments on various political issues. On the other hand, issues like education, healthcare, and the economy are all areas that are likely to display overlap between the two groups.
In my opinion, while the attention lately has been interesting, we should not settle for primary coverage. This means that we should push all of the candidates and the future president to discuss the issues relevant to our communities for the entire duration of their time in the Oval Office. Issues that deal with 25% of population should be address regularly, not solely when people need support from us. For now, we have to continue to push our representatives to advocate on our behalf and to support the groups that work hard for our integrity and personal freedoms. To see what the Republican candidates think about certain issues relevant to Latin@ communities, view the links below.
Where they stand on Puerto Rico: http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/politics/2012/01/27/insulted-puerto-ricans-slam-cnn-debate-republican-candidates/
Recently, many articles have been released about potential threats to voting rights for Blacks and Latinas/os in the upcoming Presidential election. Considering the history of disenfranchisement in this country, the recent news has been alarming for many activist groups. Furthermore, the potential disenfranchisement of several minority voters could possibly be helpful for Republican hopefuls who are looking to for a big election win. For those who are not familiar with the new legislation that has been passed in several states, read the articles below:
One of the most interesting sections of the first article was the block quote below:
Studies have showed that the proportion of voters who do not have access to valid photo ID cards is much higher among older African-Americans because they were not given birth certificates in the days of segregation. Students and young voters also often lack identification and are thus in danger of being stripped of their right to vote.
This block quote was interesting for me because it highlighted the intersection between two critical groups: young/student voters and minority voters. As a young student of color, it could possibly seem as though voting is an impossible task. However, instead of feeling defeated, all students should look up the requirements for voting in the their state. If you happen to me an out-of-state student like myself, absentee voting is also a possibility. Check out the link below to see the process:
Sadly, some states have restrictive laws that make it impossible for college students to vote, regardless of their eligibility. Some of the restrictions arise from issues of government identification, residency, and school identification. For more information on this issue, read the articles below:
Overall, the issue of voting restrictions is very problematic. Instead of allowing these political tactics to defeat minority voters, we must educate ourselves about the alternative options available to us. We can spread information about early voting, acceptable forms of identification, required amounts of identification, absentee voting, and so on. Voting is an important right that should not be taken away. The election will be here in no time, and we do have the power to rock the vote and take what is ours.
Absolutely wild. Unfortunately, these are all real clips.